Bhuvan Singh alias Govind vs State of U.P. — 935/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010026142026

Filing Number

2279/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

935/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

ST318

Police Station

HANDIA

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(2)Va

Petitioner(s)

1.Bhuvan Singh alias Govind

Respondent(s)

1.State of U.P.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Case Summary: 935/2026 Bhuvan Singh alias Govind v. State of U.P. The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to petitioner Bhuvan Singh on March 12, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(5)(k) arising from an alleged violent altercation on March 14, 2019. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and caste-based slurs were made, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, had not misused interim bail previously, and the case circumstances did not warrant custody, warranting bail with personal bond of ₹30,000 and a surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Special Judge SC and ST Act
27-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
27-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 935/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 935/2026 Bhuvan Singh alias Govind v. State of U.P. The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to petitioner Bhuvan Singh on March 12, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(5)(k) arising from an alleged violent altercation on March 14, 2019. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and caste-based slurs were made, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, had not misused interim bail previously, and the case circumstances did not warrant custody, warranting bail with personal bond of ₹30,000 and a surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.