Bhuvan Singh alias Govind vs State of U.P. — 935/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010026142026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2279/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

935/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

ST318

Police Station

HANDIA

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(2)Va

Petitioner(s)

Bhuvan Singh alias Govind

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

12-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 935/2026 Bhuvan Singh alias Govind v. State of U.P. The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to petitioner Bhuvan Singh on March 12, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(5)(k) arising from an alleged violent altercation on March 14, 2019. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and caste-based slurs were made, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, had not misused interim bail previously, and the case circumstances did not warrant custody, warranting bail with personal bond of ₹30,000 and a surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 935/2026 Bhuvan Singh alias Govind v. State of U.P. The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to petitioner Bhuvan Singh on March 12, 2026, in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(5)(k) arising from an alleged violent altercation on March 14, 2019. The court found that while serious allegations of assault and caste-based slurs were made, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, had not misused interim bail previously, and the case circumstances did not warrant custody, warranting bail with personal bond of ₹30,000 and a surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case