Mahajan Gupta alias Shivam Gupta vs State of U.P. — 937/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,354. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010026132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2278/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

937/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

151

Police Station

COLONALGANJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,354
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(1)X,(d),(dh)

Petitioner(s)

Mahajan Gupta alias Shivam Gupta

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

24-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order

Case 937/2026 Summary: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to Mahajan Gupta alias Shivam Gupta, accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 354 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)-(h). The court found that while the allegations involved assault, obscene conduct, and caste-based slurs against the complainant and her daughter on February 3, 2023, the serious nature of offenses alone does not warrant bail rejection. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that prior criminal history—not mere charge gravity—determines bail eligibility, and granted bail on ₹30,000 personal bond with standard conditions requiring cooperation in trial proceedings and abstention from illegal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 937/2026 Summary: The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to Mahajan Gupta alias Shivam Gupta, accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 354 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d)-(h). The court found that while the allegations involved assault, obscene conduct, and caste-based slurs against the complainant and her daughter on February 3, 2023, the serious nature of offenses alone does not warrant bail rejection. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent establishing that prior criminal history—not mere charge gravity—determines bail eligibility, and granted bail on ₹30,000 personal bond with standard conditions requiring cooperation in trial proceedings and abstention from illegal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case