Foolkali vs State of U.P. — 910/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010025692026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2239/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

910/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge EC Act

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

1307

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Foolkali

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Special Judge EC Act

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case