Foolkali vs State of U.P. — 910/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010025692026

Filing Number

2239/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

910/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-Special Judge Ec Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1307

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Foolkali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge Ec Act

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge Ec Act

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 910/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case