Foolkali vs State of U.P. — 910/2026
Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPAD010025692026
Filing Number
2239/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
910/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-Special Judge EC Act
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1307
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Foolkali
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Special Judge EC Act
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 910/2026 - Foolkali v. State of U.P. Foolkali was arrested for alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act 2003 after an electricity department team found her operating a mill without proper electrical connection on 26.12.2019. The court granted her bail application, finding that the case against her lacked credible independent witness testimony and that the charge sheet was based on mere suspicion. The court noted she was arrested 4 months after the incident with no explanation, had no criminal history, and the offense carried a maximum sentence of 3-5 years, making her eligible for bail. She was released on bail of Rs. 20,000 with a personal bond and an undertaking not to repeat the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts