Shiv Babu vs State of U.P. — 913/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,108. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010025582026

Filing Number

2231/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

913/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

19

Police Station

KAUNDHIYARA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shiv Babu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    CASE 913/2026 SUMMARY The court granted bail to Shiv Babu in a case involving charges under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 352, and 108 related to the death of his sister-in-law. The petitioner's bail application was accepted on the condition of a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a reliable surety, finding that the prosecution's charges were largely circumstantial and based on suspicion rather than concrete evidence. The court ordered the petitioner to appear before the court as required, abstain from further offenses, and not interfere with witnesses during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 913/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE 913/2026 SUMMARY The court granted bail to Shiv Babu in a case involving charges under IPC sections 85, 115(2), 352, and 108 related to the death of his sister-in-law. The petitioner's bail application was accepted on the condition of a personal bond of ₹50,000 with a reliable surety, finding that the prosecution's charges were largely circumstantial and based on suspicion rather than concrete evidence. The court ordered the petitioner to appear before the court as required, abstain from further offenses, and not interfere with witnesses during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case