Vijayraj and others vs State of U.P. — 773/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,325,504. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010021802026

Filing Number

1895/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

773/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

481

Police Station

GHOORPUR

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,325,504
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(1)d,dh

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijayraj and others

  2. 2.Lal Bahadur

  3. 3.Radheshyam

  4. 4.Avnish

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Prayagraj approved bail for four accused—Vijayraj, Lal Bahadur, Radheshyam, and Avnish—in case 481/2017 involving charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s). The court found that the prosecution's allegations were not sufficiently serious, the accused had no criminal history, and they had already been granted interim bail without misuse; accordingly, bail was granted on personal bonds of ₹30,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge SC and ST Act

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Special Judge SC and ST Act

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Prayagraj approved bail for four accused—Vijayraj, Lal Bahadur, Radheshyam, and Avnish—in case 481/2017 involving charges under IPC sections 325, 323, 504 and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s). The court found that the prosecution's allegations were not sufficiently serious, the accused had no criminal history, and they had already been granted interim bail without misuse; accordingly, bail was granted on personal bonds of ₹30,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case