Pradum Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. — 771/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1),110,131,117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010021712026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1886/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

771/2026

Registration Date

19-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

274

Police Station

HANDIA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1),110,131,117(2)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act Section 3(2)V,3(1)d,dh,3(2)Va

Petitioner(s)

Pradum Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Special Judge SC and ST Act

17-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

19-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Pradum Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. (771/2026) The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to accused Pradum Kumar Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 110, 131, 117(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e), 3(2)(v). The court found that while the FIR alleged the accused participated in beating the complainant's family with sticks at a wedding event on 17-18 May 2025, he was not named in the initial police report, had already been released on interim bail without misusing it, and co-accused received bail in similar proceedings. The court approved bail with a ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties on standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pradum Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. (771/2026) The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to accused Pradum Kumar Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 110, 131, 117(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e), 3(2)(v). The court found that while the FIR alleged the accused participated in beating the complainant's family with sticks at a wedding event on 17-18 May 2025, he was not named in the initial police report, had already been released on interim bail without misusing it, and co-accused received bail in similar proceedings. The court approved bail with a ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties on standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case