Pradum Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. — 771/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),109(1),110,131,117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPAD010021712026
Filing Number
1886/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
771/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Special Judge SC and ST Act
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
274
Police Station
HANDIA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pradum Kumar Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Pradum Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. (771/2026) The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to accused Pradum Kumar Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 110, 131, 117(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e), 3(2)(v). The court found that while the FIR alleged the accused participated in beating the complainant's family with sticks at a wedding event on 17-18 May 2025, he was not named in the initial police report, had already been released on interim bail without misusing it, and co-accused received bail in similar proceedings. The court approved bail with a ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties on standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC and ST Act
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC and ST Act
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC and ST Act
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 771/2026
Case Summary: Pradum Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. (771/2026) The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj granted bail to accused Pradum Kumar Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109(1), 110, 131, 117(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e), 3(2)(v). The court found that while the FIR alleged the accused participated in beating the complainant's family with sticks at a wedding event on 17-18 May 2025, he was not named in the initial police report, had already been released on interim bail without misusing it, and co-accused received bail in similar proceedings. The court approved bail with a ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties on standard conditions prohibiting evidence tampering and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts