Imtiyaj vs Jahida Begum and others — 114/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPAD010018552026
Filing Number
300/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
114/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Session Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Imtiyaj
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jahida Begum and others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The District Judge of Prayagraj rejected Imtiyaaz's transfer application seeking to shift Original Suit No. 991 of 2007 from the Civil Judge's court on the ground that the court was vacant. The court found no valid grounds for transfer as the Presiding Officer's report confirmed the court is functioning and the judge is not on leave. The judge directed the concerned court to dispose of the pending matter expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Session Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Session Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2026
The District Judge of Prayagraj rejected Imtiyaaz's transfer application seeking to shift Original Suit No. 991 of 2007 from the Civil Judge's court on the ground that the court was vacant. The court found no valid grounds for transfer as the Presiding Officer's report confirmed the court is functioning and the judge is not on leave. The judge directed the concerned court to dispose of the pending matter expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts