Dharmaraj and others vs State of U.P. — 642/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),333,117(2),110. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPAD010015102026

Filing Number

1285/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

642/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Additional District and Session Judge RNo. 1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

SARAI MEMREZ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(2),333,117(2),110

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmaraj and others

  2. 2.Ramraj

  3. 3.Sheshmani

  4. 4.Jasvant

  5. 5.Neeraj Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 642/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused persons (Dharmaraj, Ramraj, Sheshmani, Jaswant, and Neeraj) charged with assault causing serious injuries under IPC Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333, 117(C), and 110. The court found the charges relate to a serious criminal offense involving skull fracture and wrist fracture injuries to the complainant, and determined that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the allegations and documented medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Session Judge RNo. 1

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge RNo. 1

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 642/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 642/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition of five accused persons (Dharmaraj, Ramraj, Sheshmani, Jaswant, and Neeraj) charged with assault causing serious injuries under IPC Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 333, 117(C), and 110. The court found the charges relate to a serious criminal offense involving skull fracture and wrist fracture injuries to the complainant, and determined that anticipatory bail was not warranted given the gravity of the allegations and documented medical evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case