Rani Devi and others vs Rashmi — 15/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPAD010002742026

Filing Number

48/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Session Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rani Devi and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rashmi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The District Judge rejected Rani Devi's transfer application seeking to move the part-heard case (O.S. No. 408 of 1996) from the Additional District Judge's court to the Special Judge's court. The court found no reasonable grounds for transfer and held that judicial propriety forbids transferring part-heard cases. The original court was directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Session Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  12. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Session Judge

  13. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge rejected Rani Devi's transfer application seeking to move the part-heard case (O.S. No. 408 of 1996) from the Additional District Judge's court to the Special Judge's court. The court found no reasonable grounds for transfer and held that judicial propriety forbids transferring part-heard cases. The original court was directed to dispose of the matter expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case