Chandriya and 5 others vs Veeraputhiran — 187/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 18th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR250015512024
Filing Number
206/2024
Filing Date
18-Nov-2024
Registration No
187/2024
Registration Date
18-Nov-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandriya and 5 others
Adv. R Rajendran
-
2.Eswari
Adv. R Rajendran
-
3.Arunpandiyan
-
4.Suruthi
Adv. R Rajendran
-
5.Manoj
Adv. R Rajendran
-
6.Bhaskaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.Veeraputhiran
-
2.Manaharan
Adv. R Rajendran
-
3.Pandiyan
-
4.Maragatham
-
5.Dharmaraj
-
6.Paranjothi
-
7.Thenammal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 187/2024 Summary The District Munsif Court of Vathirayiruppu dismissed the suit filed by Chandriya and five others against Veeraputhiran and others on April 18, 2026, due to the plaintiff's default in appearance. The primary witness (PW1) failed to appear for cross-examination despite one month passing since his chief examination on March 11, 2026, and no valid reason was provided for his absence. The case involved agricultural land disputes in Kaansapuram village concerning multiple survey numbers totaling approximately 4.47 hectares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Apr-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 187/2024
Case 187/2024 Summary The District Munsif Court of Vathirayiruppu dismissed the suit filed by Chandriya and five others against Veeraputhiran and others on April 18, 2026, due to the plaintiff's default in appearance. The primary witness (PW1) failed to appear for cross-examination despite one month passing since his chief examination on March 11, 2026, and no valid reason was provided for his absence. The case involved agricultural land disputes in Kaansapuram village concerning multiple survey numbers totaling approximately 4.47 hectares. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts