Pandiyarajan vs Jeyaram and 2 others — 142/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR250012362024
Filing Number
197/2024
Filing Date
27-Aug-2024
Registration No
142/2024
Registration Date
27-Aug-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pandiyarajan
Adv. V. Muthukumar
-
2.Guruvayurappan
Adv. Muthukumar V
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jeyaram and 2 others
-
2.Yasodha
-
3.Krishnamoorthi
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case 142/2024 Summary: On 10.06.2026, the District Civil and Arbitration Court in Vathiraiyiruppu conducted witness examination and cross-examination of the respondents' side. The witness testified regarding his approximately 6 years of employment at the disputed property and acknowledged statements made in his affidavit. The court found credibility issues with the witness testimony, noting contradictions and lack of supporting documentary evidence regarding his work period. The case proceeded with examination and cross-examination; the witness's statement was recorded, read back, verified, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2026
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Sep-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 142/2024
Case 142/2024 Summary: On 10.06.2026, the District Civil and Arbitration Court in Vathiraiyiruppu conducted witness examination and cross-examination of the respondents' side. The witness testified regarding his approximately 6 years of employment at the disputed property and acknowledged statements made in his affidavit. The court found credibility issues with the witness testimony, noting contradictions and lack of supporting documentary evidence regarding his work period. The case proceeded with examination and cross-examination; the witness's statement was recorded, read back, verified, and signed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts