Thangavel vs Thangaraj Advocate - A. Udayakumar — 84/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR250009852024

Filing Number

162/2024

Filing Date

08-Aug-2023

Registration No

84/2024

Registration Date

08-Aug-2023

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thangavel

    Adv. Prabakaramoorthy J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangaraj Advocate - A. Udayakumar

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 84/2024 - Thangavel vs. Thangaraj Advocate Court: District Civil and Arbitration Court, Vathiraiyruppu Date: 10.06.2026 Outcome: The witness (petitioner Thangavel) was recalled, re-sworn, and cross-examined by the respondent's counsel. During cross-examination, the witness made contradictory statements regarding: land sale transactions, execution of unregistered agreements dated 12.03.2019, receipt of advance payments (₹5,16,750/-), alleged document theft by one Thangaraj, and conflicting claims about property possession and cultivation. The court noted significant discrepancies between the witness's sworn testimony and his earlier filed pleadings and affidavit. The case remains pending with further examination proceedings continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 17-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 10-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 06-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 16-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 28-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 10-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 20-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 27-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 28-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 30-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 04-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 28-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 08-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 84/2024 - Thangavel vs. Thangaraj Advocate Court: District Civil and Arbitration Court, Vathiraiyruppu Date: 10.06.2026 Outcome: The witness (petitioner Thangavel) was recalled, re-sworn, and cross-examined by the respondent's counsel. During cross-examination, the witness made contradictory statements regarding: land sale transactions, execution of unregistered agreements dated 12.03.2019, receipt of advance payments (₹5,16,750/-), alleged document theft by one Thangaraj, and conflicting claims about property possession and cultivation. The court noted significant discrepancies between the witness's sworn testimony and his earlier filed pleadings and affidavit. The case remains pending with further examination proceedings continuing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case