SI of Police Watrap vs PANDI — 39/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),324. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th April 2026.
RCS - Referred Charge Sheet
CNR: TNVR250009012025
e-Filing Number
25-03-2025
Filing Number
848/2025
Filing Date
25-Jun-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
07-Aug-2025
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
189
Police Station
Watrap
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of Police Watrap
Adv. Inspector of Police Watrap PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANDI
-
2.VIJAYA
-
3.VALLIYAMMAL
-
4.PAPPATHI
-
5.PARAMI(PARAMESHWARI)
-
6.PETCHIYAMMAL
-
7.VAIRAMMAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court Watrap allowed the police's petition (RCS/39/2025) and closed the FIR against respondents Pandi, Vijaya, and Valliyammal. The court treated the complainant's repeated absence and failure to file objections despite multiple opportunities as implied consent to the police's final report, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Counter
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Counter
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
Counter
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Dec-2025
Counter
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Oct-2025
Appearance
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2025
The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court Watrap allowed the police's petition (RCS/39/2025) and closed the FIR against respondents Pandi, Vijaya, and Valliyammal. The court treated the complainant's repeated absence and failure to file objections despite multiple opportunities as implied consent to the police's final report, resulting in case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts