S.I. of Police, Watrap P.S. vs Sundarraj Alias Poun Sundarraj and 7 others Advocate - B.Balasubramaninan — 179/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,294(b),324,506(2),109,506(1). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVR250008302024
Filing Number
269/2024
Filing Date
13-Oct-2020
Registration No
179/2024
Registration Date
13-Oct-2020
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
25-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
635
Police Station
Watrap
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.I. of Police, Watrap P.S.
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sundarraj Alias Poun Sundarraj and 7 others Advocate - B.Balasubramaninan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 179/2024 Court Decision (25.05.2026): All eight accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 148, 149 r/w 109, 294(b), 324, 506(1)-(2) due to material inconsistencies in prosecution witnesses' testimonies, lack of corroboration, and admitted prior enmity between parties creating reasonable doubt of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-May-2026
Disposed
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
06-May-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Questioning
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Jun-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Apr-2025
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jan-2025
Appearance
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Dec-2024
Appearance
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Nov-2024
Appearance
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearance
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2024
Case Summary: C.C. No. 179/2024 Court Decision (25.05.2026): All eight accused persons were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 148, 149 r/w 109, 294(b), 324, 506(1)-(2) due to material inconsistencies in prosecution witnesses' testimonies, lack of corroboration, and admitted prior enmity between parties creating reasonable doubt of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts