Ravichandran vs Jayadev Amarnath and 5 others — 155/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR250008122024
Filing Number
147/2024
Filing Date
06-Feb-2024
Registration No
155/2024
Registration Date
06-Feb-2024
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravichandran
Adv. T.Thangamani
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayadev Amarnath and 5 others
-
2.Vasanthi
-
3.Virudhunagar District Collector
-
4.RDO of Revenue Sivakasi
-
5.Varuvai Vattatciyar
-
6.Village Administrative Officer ,Watrap
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Judgement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: 155/2024 Case: District Civil and Arbitration Court, Virudunagar | Date: 18.03.2026 Petitioner: Ravichandran On 18.03.2026, the witness was recalled, re-sworn, and examined. Cross-examination of defendants 3-6 was conducted. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding his claim for permanent injunction against establishment of a firecracker factory on adjacent property (Survey No. 288, 1 acre 84 cents), alleging it would affect agricultural water sources. The case concerns property partition and alleged unauthorized industrial permission granted to "Venthan Fire Work Industries" on Survey Nos. 279/2, 280/1-3. The hearing concluded with witness testimony recorded and signed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Issues
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Aug-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jul-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jun-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Feb-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Sep-2024
Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2024
Case Summary: 155/2024 Case: District Civil and Arbitration Court, Virudunagar | Date: 18.03.2026 Petitioner: Ravichandran On 18.03.2026, the witness was recalled, re-sworn, and examined. Cross-examination of defendants 3-6 was conducted. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding his claim for permanent injunction against establishment of a firecracker factory on adjacent property (Survey No. 288, 1 acre 84 cents), alleging it would affect agricultural water sources. The case concerns property partition and alleged unauthorized industrial permission granted to "Venthan Fire Work Industries" on Survey Nos. 279/2, 280/1-3. The hearing concluded with witness testimony recorded and signed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts