Shanmugam ammal and another vs Kumar and another Advocate - BOJARAJAN M — 169/2024
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(b). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR250005482024
Filing Number
65/2024
Filing Date
24-Jul-2017
Registration No
169/2024
Registration Date
24-Jul-2017
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap
Judge
1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shanmugam ammal and another
Adv. S Sankaranarayanan
-
2.Marimuthu Thevar
Adv. S Sankaranarayanan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumar and another Advocate - BOJARAJAN M
-
2.Mari
Adv. BOJARAJAN M
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jun-2026
Arguments
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case 169/2024 Summary This is a property dispute case heard in the District Munsiff Court, Vathiraiyruppu on 18.03.2026. The witness (defendant Kumar) was recalled, sworn, and cross-examined regarding land ownership and boundaries. The testimony involved complex genealogical and property succession claims spanning multiple generations, with disputes over land measurements (54 vs. 58 feet) and boundary demarcation. The case centers on competing claims to property based on sale deeds and revenue documents, with the court hearing evidence about ancestral property divisions and alleged encroachments on the disputed plot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Feb-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Jan-2026
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Jan-2026
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Dec-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Nov-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Oct-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Oct-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
26-Sep-2025
Amendment
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2025
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2025
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jun-2025
Steps
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Jan-2025
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 169/2024
Case 169/2024 Summary This is a property dispute case heard in the District Munsiff Court, Vathiraiyruppu on 18.03.2026. The witness (defendant Kumar) was recalled, sworn, and cross-examined regarding land ownership and boundaries. The testimony involved complex genealogical and property succession claims spanning multiple generations, with disputes over land measurements (54 vs. 58 feet) and boundary demarcation. The case centers on competing claims to property based on sale deeds and revenue documents, with the court hearing evidence about ancestral property divisions and alleged encroachments on the disputed plot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts