Selvaraj vs The SI of Watrap P.S — 92/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR250002702026

Filing Number

266/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

92/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Watrap

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

356

Police Station

Watrap

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvaraj

    Adv. Karuppaiah P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The SI of Watrap P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Selvaraj v. The SI of Watrap P.S (CRLMP/92/2026) The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Watrap, Virudhunagar allowed Selvaraj's criminal petition against the SI of Watrap Police Station on 15-04-2026. The court granted relief to the petitioner with conditions after hearing arguments from petitioner's counsel Mr. Ramar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Selvaraj v. The SI of Watrap P.S (CRLMP/92/2026) The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Watrap, Virudhunagar allowed Selvaraj's criminal petition against the SI of Watrap Police Station on 15-04-2026. The court granted relief to the petitioner with conditions after hearing arguments from petitioner's counsel Mr. Ramar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case