Tamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police vs Balamurugan — 408/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 278,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th June 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNVR240012072025

Filing Number

1164/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2019

Registration No

408/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2019

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Kariapatti

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

29-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

105

Police Station

Kariapatti P.S.

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 278,337,338
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/8/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/12/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/13/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police
Mp/15/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section BalamuruganTamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tamil nadu state Rep by Inspector of Police

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balamurugan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 24-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 22-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Jun-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: STC.No.408/2025 This case involves a witness deposition (PW.7 Vinothkumar) in a traffic accident investigation at Judicial Magistrate Court, Kariapatti. On March 10, 2019, a vehicle collision occurred involving a car (TN 58 AB 9352) and a two-wheeler (TN 59 BR 0866), injuring two persons. The investigating officer registered an FIR under IPC Sections 279 and 337, later amended to include Section 338 after medical reports revealed serious injuries to one victim. The respondent Balamurugan allegedly drove one of the vehicles involved in the accident. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel challenged the investigation credibility, suggesting private hospitals may inflate injury severity for profit and that the complaint was fabricated for compensation purposes. The witness maintained that proper investigation protocols were followed, including scene documentation, medical records collection, and vehicle inspection reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 18-Jun-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 16-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 11-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 09-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 19-May-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  15. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  21. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 18-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 24-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 03-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 21-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC.No.408/2025 This case involves a witness deposition (PW.7 Vinothkumar) in a traffic accident investigation at Judicial Magistrate Court, Kariapatti. On March 10, 2019, a vehicle collision occurred involving a car (TN 58 AB 9352) and a two-wheeler (TN 59 BR 0866), injuring two persons. The investigating officer registered an FIR under IPC Sections 279 and 337, later amended to include Section 338 after medical reports revealed serious injuries to one victim. The respondent Balamurugan allegedly drove one of the vehicles involved in the accident. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel challenged the investigation credibility, suggesting private hospitals may inflate injury severity for profit and that the complaint was fabricated for compensation purposes. The witness maintained that proper investigation protocols were followed, including scene documentation, medical records collection, and vehicle inspection reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case