Panneerselvam, Proprietor M/S. Sivasakthi Textiles vs R.Ananthabaskar and one another — 7/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 6 R 14(A). Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

COS - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: TNVR230043342024

Filing Number

2181/2024

Filing Date

11-Jul-2022

Registration No

7/2024

Registration Date

11-Jul-2022

Court

Sub Court, Rajapalayam

Judge

3-Sub Court,Rajapalayam

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 6 R 14(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Panneerselvam, Proprietor M/S. Sivasakthi Textiles

    Adv. Kalidass K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R.Ananthabaskar and one another

  2. 2.S.Ponnuraj, Proprietor of M/s.Keerthi Tex

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: C.O.S.No.07/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim, ordering Respondents 1 and 2 to pay Rs. 24,72,533/- comprising principal of Rs. 18,22,730/- plus 9% annual interest from filing date until judgment and 6% interest thereafter. Respondent 2 was dismissed from the case. The court found Respondent 1 conducted a direct business transaction with the petitioner involving yarn sales from 2017-2018, establishing liability for outstanding dues despite Respondent 2's agent status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  14. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

  16. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  18. 22-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  19. 26-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

  20. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  21. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  22. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  23. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  24. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  25. 09-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

  26. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  27. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  28. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  29. 14-Aug-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

  30. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  31. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  32. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  33. 03-Jul-2025

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  34. 16-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  35. 16-Apr-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  36. 20-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  37. 04-Dec-2024

    For further Proceedings

    Sub Court,Rajapalayam

  38. 04-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 11-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.O.S.No.07/2024 Court Decision: The court partially allowed the petitioner's claim, ordering Respondents 1 and 2 to pay Rs. 24,72,533/- comprising principal of Rs. 18,22,730/- plus 9% annual interest from filing date until judgment and 6% interest thereafter. Respondent 2 was dismissed from the case. The court found Respondent 1 conducted a direct business transaction with the petitioner involving yarn sales from 2017-2018, establishing liability for outstanding dues despite Respondent 2's agent status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case