Karuppaiah vs Arumugam — 13/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR200005222024

Filing Number

19/2024

Filing Date

28-Mar-2024

Registration No

13/2024

Registration Date

28-Mar-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruchuli

Judge

1-District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karuppaiah

    Adv. Thiru.B.Thiruppathi

  2. 2.Ramar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arumugam

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  14. 23-Oct-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    In Case 13/2024 before the District Munsif Court, Tiruchuli, petitioner Karuppaiah (witness 1) testified under Section 44(5) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, presenting his affidavit evidence regarding historical property documents and inam (land grant) settlement records spanning from 1919 to 2024. The case proceeded with the petitioner's testimony and submission of nine documentary exhibits including deeds, inam settlements, and certificates; no cross-examination was conducted as the respondent Arumugam was a party to the proceedings. The matter was adjourned to 23.10.2025 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 23-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  19. 10-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  20. 12-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  21. 27-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  22. 02-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  23. 25-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  24. 26-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  25. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  26. 02-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  28. 29-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate

  29. 28-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 13/2024 before the District Munsif Court, Tiruchuli, petitioner Karuppaiah (witness 1) testified under Section 44(5) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, presenting his affidavit evidence regarding historical property documents and inam (land grant) settlement records spanning from 1919 to 2024. The case proceeded with the petitioner's testimony and submission of nine documentary exhibits including deeds, inam settlements, and certificates; no cross-examination was conducted as the respondent Arumugam was a party to the proceedings. The matter was adjourned to 23.10.2025 for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case