Muthammal vs Tamilnad Transort Corporation through its General Director Advocate - P KANDASAMY — 149/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,142,166. Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 03rd June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNVR130008912022
Filing Number
966/2022
Filing Date
06-Dec-2022
Registration No
149/2022
Registration Date
12-Dec-2022
Court
Subordinate court,Aruppukottai
Judge
1-Sub Judge
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Muthammal
Adv. S THANGAPANDIAN
-
2.Rajaboopathi
Adv. S THANGAPANDIAN
-
3.Ramalakshmi
Adv. S THANGAPANDIAN
-
4.Nepolian
Adv. S THANGAPANDIAN
-
5.Indrajith
Adv. S THANGAPANDIAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tamilnad Transort Corporation through its General Director Advocate - P KANDASAMY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Arguments
Sub Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: 149/2022 The Subordinate Court at Arupukkottai heard testimony from Nagarajan (RW1), a driver for Tamilnad Transport Corporation, regarding a vehicle accident. During cross-examination, the driver's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the accident circumstances. The court found the driver's account implausible and determined that his testimony attempting to shift blame to the petitioners was unreliable. The petition filed by Muthammal, Rajaboopathi, and Ramalakshmi against the transport corporation was accordingly dismissed, with the court rejecting the respondent's defensive claims about the accident's causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
05-Apr-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
02-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub Judge
-
20-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
09-Jun-2023
Enquiry
Sub Judge
-
31-Mar-2023
Counter
Sub Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
Counter
Sub Judge
-
19-Jan-2023
Counter
Sub Judge
-
12-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2022
Case Summary: 149/2022 The Subordinate Court at Arupukkottai heard testimony from Nagarajan (RW1), a driver for Tamilnad Transport Corporation, regarding a vehicle accident. During cross-examination, the driver's testimony revealed significant inconsistencies and contradictions regarding the accident circumstances. The court found the driver's account implausible and determined that his testimony attempting to shift blame to the petitioners was unreliable. The petition filed by Muthammal, Rajaboopathi, and Ramalakshmi against the transport corporation was accordingly dismissed, with the court rejecting the respondent's defensive claims about the accident's causation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts