E.Mariselvi vs M.Muthuval Pandian Advocate - Mr K Ravi — 204/2023
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(i-a). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVR090011582023
Filing Number
741/2023
Filing Date
20-11-2023
Registration No
204/2023
Registration Date
21-11-2023
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
E.Mariselvi
Adv. Thiru.S.Ramesh
Respondent(s)
M.Muthuval Pandian Advocate - Mr K Ravi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination testimony in a matrimonial case (HMOP No. 204/2023) from the Virudunagar Court dated 20.02.2026. The witness denies allegations of domestic violence and infidelity, claiming the marriage was arranged by elders, that he did not abuse his wife, and that he never pursued another woman named Karthik as alleged. The witness contests claims about dowry, states he contributed financially to the household, and denies responsibility for family conflicts or spreading false information on social media. He seeks appropriate relief under marital laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination testimony in a matrimonial case (HMOP No. 204/2023) from the Virudunagar Court dated 20.02.2026. The witness denies allegations of domestic violence and infidelity, claiming the marriage was arranged by elders, that he did not abuse his wife, and that he never pursued another woman named Karthik as alleged. The witness contests claims about dowry, states he contributed financially to the household, and denies responsibility for family conflicts or spreading false information on social media. He seeks appropriate relief under marital laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts