Rajapandian vs Tamaraiselvi Advocate - Tr.P.Manoharan — 186/2023

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section sec.13(1). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Orders Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNVR090010622023

Filing Number

702/2023

Filing Date

16-Oct-2023

Registration No

186/2023

Registration Date

18-Oct-2023

Court

Sub Court, Virudhunagar

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section sec.13(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajapandian

    Adv. J.Marikumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tamaraiselvi Advocate - Tr.P.Manoharan

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  13. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  14. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge

  15. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  16. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary In O.S. No. 91/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Virudunagar (dated 09.01.2026), the court examined witness DW2 (Rengraj) regarding a property dispute. The witness testified that he has no rights to the property in question, admitted inconsistencies in his evidence regarding property transfers and document execution, and acknowledged he may have given biased testimony in favor of the defendant Narayanan. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and inadmissible due to his admitted bias and credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  18. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  19. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  20. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  21. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  22. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  23. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  24. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  25. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  26. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  27. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  28. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  29. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  30. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  31. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge

  32. 25-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  33. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  34. 11-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  35. 13-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  36. 03-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  37. 08-Apr-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  38. 25-Mar-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  39. 25-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  40. 14-Mar-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  41. 21-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  42. 12-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  43. 24-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  44. 03-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  45. 06-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  46. 02-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  47. 26-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  48. 22-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  49. 08-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  50. 22-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  51. 27-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  52. 13-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  53. 06-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  54. 23-Aug-2024

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  55. 23-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  56. 16-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  57. 09-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  58. 02-Aug-2024

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  59. 02-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  60. 05-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  61. 30-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge

  62. 19-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  63. 15-Mar-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  64. 16-Feb-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  65. 05-Jan-2024

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  66. 24-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge

  67. 18-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 16-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In O.S. No. 91/2020 before the Subordinate Court, Virudunagar (dated 09.01.2026), the court examined witness DW2 (Rengraj) regarding a property dispute. The witness testified that he has no rights to the property in question, admitted inconsistencies in his evidence regarding property transfers and document execution, and acknowledged he may have given biased testimony in favor of the defendant Narayanan. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable and inadmissible due to his admitted bias and credibility issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case