Inspector Of Police Kariapatti Ps vs Meenatchi Advocate - Mr.P.Pandiaraj — 121/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 272,273,328IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVR090004662024
e-Filing Number
13-12-2023
Filing Number
80/2024
Filing Date
18-01-2024
Registration No
121/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector Of Police Kariapatti Ps (Police Station)
Adv. Inspector of Police kariyapatti
Respondent(s)
Meenatchi Advocate - Mr.P.Pandiaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 04-03-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Summary In Sessions Case No. 121 of 2024 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, witness PW4 (a 43-year-old police officer) testified that on 17.06.2022, based on secret information, he and colleagues raided a small shop near K. Sevalpatty bus stand where banned tobacco products were being sold illegally. The defendant voluntarily produced 12 packets of Khasp cigarettes and 15 packets of Coolip, which were seized under IPC sections 272, 273, 328 and COTPA Act section 24(1). During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was substantially challenged regarding procedural irregularities, including lack of proper documentation, witness signatures, and inconsistencies in the arrest procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Sessions Case No. 121 of 2024 before the Assistant Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, witness PW4 (a 43-year-old police officer) testified that on 17.06.2022, based on secret information, he and colleagues raided a small shop near K. Sevalpatty bus stand where banned tobacco products were being sold illegally. The defendant voluntarily produced 12 packets of Khasp cigarettes and 15 packets of Coolip, which were seized under IPC sections 272, 273, 328 and COTPA Act section 24(1). During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was substantially challenged regarding procedural irregularities, including lack of proper documentation, witness signatures, and inconsistencies in the arrest procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts