J.Mariappan vs M.Sugumari Advocate - Mr.M.Vivekanand — 36/2021
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1) (i-a). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVR090001412021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
103/2021
Filing Date
22-02-2021
Registration No
36/2021
Registration Date
22-02-2021
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J.Mariappan
Adv. K.Venkatesh
Respondent(s)
M.Sugumari Advocate - Mr.M.Vivekanand
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 13-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this H.M.O.P (Restitution of Conjugal Rights) case heard at the Virudunagar Subordinate Court on 17.10.2024, the respondent wife testified and sought dismissal of the petition filed by the husband. During cross-examination, the wife challenged the husband's claims, asserting she did not live as a couple with him after February 2018 and denied allegations of cruelty. The petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed, and the wife's prayer for dismissal was upheld based on the court's evaluation of the conflicting testimonies and evidence presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this H.M.O.P (Restitution of Conjugal Rights) case heard at the Virudunagar Subordinate Court on 17.10.2024, the respondent wife testified and sought dismissal of the petition filed by the husband. During cross-examination, the wife challenged the husband's claims, asserting she did not live as a couple with him after February 2018 and denied allegations of cruelty. The petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed, and the wife's prayer for dismissal was upheld based on the court's evaluation of the conflicting testimonies and evidence presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts