J.Mariappan vs M.Sugumari Advocate - Mr.M.Vivekanand — 36/2021
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1) (i-a). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVR090001412021
Filing Number
103/2021
Filing Date
22-Feb-2021
Registration No
36/2021
Registration Date
22-Feb-2021
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J.Mariappan
Adv. K.Venkatesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.Sugumari Advocate - Mr.M.Vivekanand
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
IA Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Jan-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Dec-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Dec-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Nov-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Nov-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Nov-2024
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Summary: In this H.M.O.P (Restitution of Conjugal Rights) case heard at the Virudunagar Subordinate Court on 17.10.2024, the respondent wife testified and sought dismissal of the petition filed by the husband. During cross-examination, the wife challenged the husband's claims, asserting she did not live as a couple with him after February 2018 and denied allegations of cruelty. The petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed, and the wife's prayer for dismissal was upheld based on the court's evaluation of the conflicting testimonies and evidence presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Jun-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Apr-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Mar-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Mar-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jan-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Jan-2024
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Nov-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Nov-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Oct-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Jul-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Apr-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
31-Mar-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Mar-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Feb-2023
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
10-Feb-2023
Evidence
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Jan-2023
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Sep-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Sep-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Aug-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
15-Jul-2022
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Jun-2022
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
13-Apr-2022
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Apr-2022
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Jan-2022
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Dec-2021
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Oct-2021
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Aug-2021
Appearance
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Aug-2021
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Jul-2021
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
26-Mar-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2021
Summary: In this H.M.O.P (Restitution of Conjugal Rights) case heard at the Virudunagar Subordinate Court on 17.10.2024, the respondent wife testified and sought dismissal of the petition filed by the husband. During cross-examination, the wife challenged the husband's claims, asserting she did not live as a couple with him after February 2018 and denied allegations of cruelty. The petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed, and the wife's prayer for dismissal was upheld based on the court's evaluation of the conflicting testimonies and evidence presented by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts