M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd Virudhunagar Branch Rep by its Authorized Representative vs Mahalingam and 1 other Advocate - Mr M Subburam — 28/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order21. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVR090001362023
Filing Number
135/2023
Filing Date
27-Feb-2023
Registration No
28/2023
Registration Date
12-Apr-2023
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd Virudhunagar Branch Rep by its Authorized Representative
Adv. S.Sridharan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahalingam and 1 other Advocate - Mr M Subburam
-
2.Ramaraj
Adv. Mr M Subburam
Case History
-
21-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Orders
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Arguments
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
05-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
08-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary E.P. No. 28/2023 - Subordinate Court, Virudunagar | Date: 08.07.2025 This is a cross-examination transcript in a debt recovery case where Sri Ram Transport Company's sales manager testified against a respondent who borrowed ₹5,50,000 for a Tata Magic vehicle. The witness (petitioner's representative) claimed the respondent paid only 13 of 60 monthly installments of ₹13,992 each, and the vehicle was auctioned for ₹3,50,000 after default. The case involved disputes over actual payments made, auction price discrepancies, and an alleged extra charge of ₹25,000 collected from the respondent. The case was adjourned for further examination of witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
28-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Sep-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
10-Jul-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
04-Jun-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
29-Jan-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
27-Jun-2023
Counter
Subordinate Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2023
Case Summary E.P. No. 28/2023 - Subordinate Court, Virudunagar | Date: 08.07.2025 This is a cross-examination transcript in a debt recovery case where Sri Ram Transport Company's sales manager testified against a respondent who borrowed ₹5,50,000 for a Tata Magic vehicle. The witness (petitioner's representative) claimed the respondent paid only 13 of 60 monthly installments of ₹13,992 each, and the vehicle was auctioned for ₹3,50,000 after default. The case involved disputes over actual payments made, auction price discrepancies, and an alleged extra charge of ₹25,000 collected from the respondent. The case was adjourned for further examination of witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts