Balaji and two others vs Perumal samy and two others Advocate - Thirupathy.B — 200046/2012
Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNVR090000892012
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
200046/2012
Filing Date
29-08-2012
Registration No
200046/2012
Registration Date
29-08-2012
Court
Sub Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge
Petitioner(s)
Balaji and two others
Adv. Solairaj.N.
Kothaiammal
Adv. Solairaj.N
Muralitharan
Adv. Solairaj.N
Respondent(s)
Perumal samy and two others Advocate - Thirupathy.B
Jeya Bharathi
Adv. Exparte
Valarmathi
Adv. Exparte
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge
Evidence
Evidence
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Copy of Deposition/Evidence
Copy of Deposition/Evidence
Summary: The petition was dismissed. The court held that defendants 6-12 are not necessary parties to the original suit OS 46/2012 and rejected the petitioner's request to add them as defendants (in place of existing defendants 5-11). The court found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient grounds for the inclusion of these parties and determined they have no stake in the property dispute at issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition was dismissed. The court held that defendants 6-12 are not necessary parties to the original suit OS 46/2012 and rejected the petitioner's request to add them as defendants (in place of existing defendants 5-11). The court found that the petitioner failed to provide sufficient grounds for the inclusion of these parties and determined they have no stake in the property dispute at issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts