Jeyalakshmi and 2 others vs Kumarasamy and one another Advocate - Rajesh S — 256/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR080006642023
Filing Number
842/2023
Filing Date
13-Oct-2023
Registration No
256/2023
Registration Date
24-Nov-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Additional District Judge
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jeyalakshmi and 2 others
Adv. M. Chandrasekar
-
2.Venkatesh
Adv. Chandrasekar M
-
3.Ubathendran
Adv. Chandrasekar M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumarasamy and one another Advocate - Rajesh S
-
2.Nagajothi
Adv. Rajesh S
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Trial
Additional District Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
31-Jul-2025
IAView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
IAView PDF
Case Summary The petition filed by defendants S. Kumarasamy and S. Nagajothi to set aside an ex-parte order dated 21.03.2024 in a partition suit was allowed. The court found their reasons for non-appearance (injury and illness) sustainable under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, permitting defendants to participate in proceedings. However, the petition was conditional: it shall be allowed only upon payment of costs of Rs. 3,000 to the respondents on or before 19.08.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
05-Apr-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
20-Feb-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Judge
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
03-Aug-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
06-Jul-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
19-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
14-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
03-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 256/2023
Case Summary The petition filed by defendants S. Kumarasamy and S. Nagajothi to set aside an ex-parte order dated 21.03.2024 in a partition suit was allowed. The court found their reasons for non-appearance (injury and illness) sustainable under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, permitting defendants to participate in proceedings. However, the petition was conditional: it shall be allowed only upon payment of costs of Rs. 3,000 to the respondents on or before 19.08.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts