Jeyalakshmi and 2 others vs Kumarasamy and one another Advocate - Rajesh S — 256/2023
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR080006642023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
842/2023
Filing Date
13-10-2023
Registration No
256/2023
Registration Date
24-11-2023
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyalakshmi and 2 others
Adv. M. Chandrasekar
Venkatesh
Adv. Chandrasekar M
Ubathendran
Adv. Chandrasekar M
Respondent(s)
Kumarasamy and one another Advocate - Rajesh S
Nagajothi
Adv. Rajesh S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-02-2026 | Trial |
| 05-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The petition filed by defendants S. Kumarasamy and S. Nagajothi to set aside an ex-parte order dated 21.03.2024 in a partition suit was allowed. The court found their reasons for non-appearance (injury and illness) sustainable under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, permitting defendants to participate in proceedings. However, the petition was conditional: it shall be allowed only upon payment of costs of Rs. 3,000 to the respondents on or before 19.08.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The petition filed by defendants S. Kumarasamy and S. Nagajothi to set aside an ex-parte order dated 21.03.2024 in a partition suit was allowed. The court found their reasons for non-appearance (injury and illness) sustainable under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC, permitting defendants to participate in proceedings. However, the petition was conditional: it shall be allowed only upon payment of costs of Rs. 3,000 to the respondents on or before 19.08.2025, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts