Peter and one another vs Ponmari and 2 others — 215/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Trial Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR080005302023

Filing Number

812/2023

Filing Date

21-Sep-2023

Registration No

215/2023

Registration Date

21-Sep-2023

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Additional District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b), 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Peter and one another

    Adv. C. Haribalakrishnan

  2. 2.Savariraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ponmari and 2 others

  2. 2.Muniyarajan

  3. 3.Vinoth

  4. 4.Azagarsamy

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  4. 02-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  6. 25-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  7. 09-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  8. 02-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  10. 21-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  11. 05-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  12. 24-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    Additional District Judge

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    Additional District Judge

  14. 06-Mar-2025

    Amendment

    Additional District Judge

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Amendment

    Additional District Judge

  16. 20-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  17. 10-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  18. 27-Jan-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC to implead Alagarsamy as the 4th defendant in a property declaration suit is allowed. The court held that Alagarsamy, being the alleged vendor of the disputed property, is a necessary party to the declaration suit and must be joined as a defendant. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 27-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  21. 09-Jan-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  22. 12-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  23. 09-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  25. 25-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  26. 22-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  27. 06-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  28. 04-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  29. 17-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  30. 14-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  31. 04-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  32. 20-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  33. 30-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  34. 30-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  35. 26-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 21-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC to implead Alagarsamy as the 4th defendant in a property declaration suit is allowed. The court held that Alagarsamy, being the alleged vendor of the disputed property, is a necessary party to the declaration suit and must be joined as a defendant. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case