S.Palanichamy vs G.Loganathan and one another — 67/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7, R.1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR080004142021
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
220/2021
Filing Date
23-08-2021
Registration No
67/2021
Registration Date
23-08-2021
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Palanichamy
Adv. P.R.Marichamy
Respondent(s)
G.Loganathan and one another
L.Nagarani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 30-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 02-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 10-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by defendants Loganathan and Nagarani to set aside the court's order dated 21.11.2024 is allowed. The court granted the petitioners one more opportunity to issue a warrant against witness Pandiselvi to produce a sale deed, which is necessary for signature comparison to support their defense that the signatures on the promissory note are not theirs. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by defendants Loganathan and Nagarani to set aside the court's order dated 21.11.2024 is allowed. The court granted the petitioners one more opportunity to issue a warrant against witness Pandiselvi to produce a sale deed, which is necessary for signature comparison to support their defense that the signatures on the promissory note are not theirs. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts