Kasthuri and 2 others vs Thiagarajan and 4 others Advocate - G.Devadoss — 83/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 37(2), 25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR080002962024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
95/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
83/2024
Registration Date
18-03-2024
Court
Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kasthuri and 2 others
Adv. K.V. Ravindran
Vinmani
Adv. K.V. Ravindran
Chandra
Adv. K.V. Ravindran
Respondent(s)
Thiagarajan and 4 others Advocate - G.Devadoss
Kartheeswari
Adv. S.Rajesh
Hema
Adv. Lingasamy K
Guruswamy
Adv. Lingasamy K
Arul Kumar
Adv. Lingasamy K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Additional District Judge
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
| 06-03-2026 | Trial |
| 03-03-2026 | Trial |
| 13-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a cross-examination order from the Additional District Court, Virudunagar (Case No. 83/2024, dated 10.03.2026) in a property/succession dispute involving inherited agricultural land (pattas/plots). The court examined the first defendant's cross-examination regarding family partition history, property sales, and alleged unauthorized transfers. The cross-examination of defendants 3-5 was adjourned, and the court noted that the first plaintiff's testimony was recorded and confirmed as accurate in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a cross-examination order from the Additional District Court, Virudunagar (Case No. 83/2024, dated 10.03.2026) in a property/succession dispute involving inherited agricultural land (pattas/plots). The court examined the first defendant's cross-examination regarding family partition history, property sales, and alleged unauthorized transfers. The cross-examination of defendants 3-5 was adjourned, and the court noted that the first plaintiff's testimony was recorded and confirmed as accurate in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts