Inspector of Police, Kariapatti vs Senthilkumar — 89/2020

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b), 302. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNVR080002922020

Filing Number

89/2020

Filing Date

04-Jan-2021

Registration No

89/2020

Registration Date

04-Jan-2021

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Additional District Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 294(b), 302
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SenthilkumarInspector of Police, Kariapatti
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police, Kariapatti
Mp/8/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police, Kariapatti
Mp/9/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SenthilkumarInspector of Police, Kariapatti
Mp/10/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section SenthilkumarInspector of Police, Kariapatti
Mp/11/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Inspector of Police, Kariapatti

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Kariapatti

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Senthilkumar

  2. 2.Angappan @ Selvakumar

  3. 3.Anandakumar

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition record (PW6), not a case judgment or order. It records the testimony of witness Karupusamy given on November 19, 2025, before the Additional Sessions Judge in Virudhunagar in Sessions Case 89/2020. The witness testified regarding his signature on a site map prepared by police on May 25, 2020, and admitted to providing false testimony in favor of the accused (who are from his village). The deposition was recorded and confirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  17. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  19. 09-Aug-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Additional District Judge

  20. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  21. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  22. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  23. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/Evidence

  24. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  25. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  26. 02-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  27. 08-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  28. 27-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  29. 23-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  30. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  31. 25-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  32. 04-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  33. 14-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  34. 23-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  35. 06-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  36. 11-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  37. 16-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  38. 14-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  39. 04-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  40. 30-Oct-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  41. 04-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  42. 26-Jun-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  43. 07-Mar-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  44. 10-Jan-2023

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  45. 15-Nov-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  46. 05-Sep-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  47. 21-Jun-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  48. 26-Apr-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  49. 15-Feb-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  50. 25-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  51. 14-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  52. 23-Nov-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  53. 04-Oct-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  54. 06-Sep-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  55. 26-Jul-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  56. 05-Jul-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  57. 26-Apr-2021

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  58. 22-Mar-2021

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  59. 19-Jan-2021

    Appearance

    Additional District Judge

  60. 04-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 04-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2020

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record (PW6), not a case judgment or order. It records the testimony of witness Karupusamy given on November 19, 2025, before the Additional Sessions Judge in Virudhunagar in Sessions Case 89/2020. The witness testified regarding his signature on a site map prepared by police on May 25, 2020, and admitted to providing false testimony in favor of the accused (who are from his village). The deposition was recorded and confirmed as accurate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case