Minor.Priyadharshini G/F S. Narayanan vs Parimala and 4 Others Advocate - Subburam M — 22/2021

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 37(2), 25(d). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR080000892021

Trial

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

45/2021

Filing Date

26-11-2020

Registration No

22/2021

Registration Date

26-11-2020

Court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 37(2), 25(d)
Ia/8/2025 Classification : Amendment Petition Section Minor.Priyadharshini G/F S. NarayananParimala and 4 Others

Petitioner(s)

Minor.Priyadharshini G/F S. Narayanan

Adv. S.V.Nagarajan

Respondent(s)

Parimala and 4 Others Advocate - Subburam M

Minor.Srinivas

Adv. Subburam M

N. Baladeepa

Adv. Ramachandran M

A.Muthu Muniyandi

The Manager, ICICI Bank Ltd., Virudhunagar Branch, Virudhunagar.

Adv. GaneshBabu R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional District Judge

13-03-2026

Trial

06-03-2026

Trial

07-02-2026

Trial

03-01-2026

Issues

02-01-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

01-04-2025
Copy of Judgment

Petition Dismissed The Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar dismissed the plaintiff's petition (IA No. 08/2025) filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint. The court found that the amendment application was inconsistent with a previously allowed petition (IA.07/2025)—specifically, the name of the proposed 7th defendant differed between the two applications (mentioned as "Muthu Muniyandi @ Raja" in IA.07/2025 but as "Muniarajan" in the amendment petition), making the current amendment petition non-compliant. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Petition Dismissed The Additional District Judge, Virudhunagar dismissed the plaintiff's petition (IA No. 08/2025) filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint. The court found that the amendment application was inconsistent with a previously allowed petition (IA.07/2025)—specifically, the name of the proposed 7th defendant differed between the two applications (mentioned as "Muthu Muniyandi @ Raja" in IA.07/2025 but as "Muniarajan" in the amendment petition), making the current amendment petition non-compliant. No cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District and Sessions Court, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case