Balamurugan vs Saraswathi(Exparte) — 109/2023
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 25(d),27(c). Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR070034562023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
143/2023
Filing Date
01-12-2023
Registration No
109/2023
Registration Date
13-12-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balamurugan
Adv. M. Alagurani
Respondent(s)
Saraswathi(Exparte)
Aadhilakshmi(Exparte)
Vigneshkumar(Exparte)
Chellasamy(Exparte)
Kannan(Exparte)
Gengalakshmi(Exparte)
Sub Registrar
Adv. G.P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 06-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 09-02-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 30-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the interim application (I.A.05 of 2025) filed under Rule 9(7) of the Civil Procedure Code. The District Court set aside a unilateral ex-parte order dated 30.04.2024 issued against the petitioner (6th defendant in O.S.No.109/2023), who had failed to file a counter-affidavit due to a domestic accident causing injury on 29.04.2024. The court found the circumstances and merits warranted granting relief to the petitioner despite the delay, finding justice better served by providing an opportunity rather than maintaining the ex-parte order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the interim application (I.A.05 of 2025) filed under Rule 9(7) of the Civil Procedure Code. The District Court set aside a unilateral ex-parte order dated 30.04.2024 issued against the petitioner (6th defendant in O.S.No.109/2023), who had failed to file a counter-affidavit due to a domestic accident causing injury on 29.04.2024. The court found the circumstances and merits warranted granting relief to the petitioner despite the delay, finding justice better served by providing an opportunity rather than maintaining the ex-parte order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts