Ramaraj vs Banumathi and 5 Others Advocate - P.Ravindran — 81/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C),25(d). Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Amendment Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR070020732022

Filing Number

131/2022

Filing Date

25-Nov-2022

Registration No

81/2022

Registration Date

25-Nov-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C),25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramaraj

    Adv. S. Rajesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Banumathi and 5 Others Advocate - P.Ravindran

  2. 2.Sudha

    Adv. P.Ravindran

  3. 3.Latha

    Adv. P.Ravindran

  4. 4.Kannan

    Adv. P.Ravindran

  5. 5.Sub Inspector, Vachakarapatti P.S.

    Adv. G.P.

  6. 6.Superintendent of police, virudhunagar Dist.

    Adv. G.P.

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  15. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  20. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  21. 02-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  23. 28-Apr-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  24. 10-Mar-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  25. 19-Feb-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  26. 10-Jan-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  27. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  28. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  29. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  30. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  31. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  32. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  33. 05-Aug-2024

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: 81/2022 Court: Madurai District Civil Court, Samattur Date: 05.08.2024 Outcome: The court adjourned the proceedings at the request of defendants 1-4's counsel to allow for cross-examination. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 did not properly discharge their duties. The case involves a civil dispute where the petitioner Ramaraj claims he already provided certain documents and compensation, but the respondents dispute this. A prior police complaint (FIR 26/2022) and subsequent complaints to the District Collector's office on 19.04.2022 and 24.11.2022 were filed seeking documents and originals from the defendants. The court determined this is a civil matter requiring judicial resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  34. 05-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  35. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  36. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  37. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  38. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  39. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  40. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  41. 01-Mar-2024

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  42. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  43. 26-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  44. 14-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  45. 05-Feb-2024

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  46. 05-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  47. 24-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  48. 22-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  49. 18-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  50. 10-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  51. 04-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  52. 22-Dec-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  53. 08-Dec-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  54. 22-Nov-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  55. 18-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  56. 25-Sep-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  57. 13-Sep-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  58. 04-Sep-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  59. 24-Aug-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  60. 07-Aug-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  61. 26-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  62. 24-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  63. 14-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  64. 12-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  65. 28-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  66. 26-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  67. 06-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  68. 28-Apr-2023

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  69. 26-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  70. 24-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  71. 20-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  72. 27-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  73. 23-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  74. 25-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  75. 25-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 81/2022 Court: Madurai District Civil Court, Samattur Date: 05.08.2024 Outcome: The court adjourned the proceedings at the request of defendants 1-4's counsel to allow for cross-examination. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 did not properly discharge their duties. The case involves a civil dispute where the petitioner Ramaraj claims he already provided certain documents and compensation, but the respondents dispute this. A prior police complaint (FIR 26/2022) and subsequent complaints to the District Collector's office on 19.04.2022 and 24.11.2022 were filed seeking documents and originals from the defendants. The court determined this is a civil matter requiring judicial resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case