Solaichamy vs Sankaralingam Advocate - A.Balasubramanian — 60/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37(2). Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR070019902019
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
105/2019
Filing Date
03-09-2019
Registration No
60/2019
Registration Date
12-09-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Solaichamy
Adv. D. Baskaran
Respondent(s)
Sankaralingam Advocate - A.Balasubramanian
Chinnbalu (Exparte)
Indrakumari (Died)
Subbmmal
Adv. A.Balasubramanian
Pappa and Kanabathi
Adv. S.P.Thilakarajan
U.Rekha
Adv. S. Rajesh
Manikandan
Adv. S. Rajesh
Latha
Adv. S. Rajesh
Minor.Jothikumar
Adv. S. Rajesh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 18-02-2026 | Judgement |
Interim Orders
Summary: This Tamil Nadu civil case (A.V. No. 60/2019, dated 29.03.2022) involves a property partition dispute between family members regarding land divisions. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of defendants 1 and 4, who testified about property transfers, ownership claims, and boundary details related to multiple land parcels. The case is adjourned for cross-examination of defendants 3 and 5, with the court noting that defendants 1 and 2 must produce required documents and clarify property boundaries at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This Tamil Nadu civil case (A.V. No. 60/2019, dated 29.03.2022) involves a property partition dispute between family members regarding land divisions. The court recorded the examination-in-chief of defendants 1 and 4, who testified about property transfers, ownership claims, and boundary details related to multiple land parcels. The case is adjourned for cross-examination of defendants 3 and 5, with the court noting that defendants 1 and 2 must produce required documents and clarify property boundaries at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts