Ganthimathiyammal vs Dhanasekaran Advocate - S.Marichamy — 5/2022
Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 21(2)(a),21(2)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 06th March 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNVR070014872022
Filing Number
105/2022
Filing Date
15-09-2022
Registration No
5/2022
Registration Date
04-11-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganthimathiyammal
Adv. B. Rajasekar
Meena
Respondent(s)
Dhanasekaran Advocate - S.Marichamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | Orders |
| 02-02-2026 | Orders |
| 12-01-2026 | Orders |
| 03-01-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Rent Control Tribunal, Sathyamangalam, allowed the petition filed by the landlords (Gandhimathiammal and Siva Meenakshi) against tenant Thanasekharan under the Tamil Nadu Landlord and Tenant (Protection of Rights and Duties) Act, 2017. The court ordered the tenant to vacate the commercial property within two months and deliver possession to the landlords, finding that the tenant had failed to pay rent since October 2020 and the landlords did not wish to renew the tenancy agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Rent Control Tribunal, Sathyamangalam, allowed the petition filed by the landlords (Gandhimathiammal and Siva Meenakshi) against tenant Thanasekharan under the Tamil Nadu Landlord and Tenant (Protection of Rights and Duties) Act, 2017. The court ordered the tenant to vacate the commercial property within two months and deliver possession to the landlords, finding that the tenant had failed to pay rent since October 2020 and the landlords did not wish to renew the tenancy agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts