G.S.Kamalam vs Karuppasamy — 1/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41(3). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
RLTOP - Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlord and Tenant Original Petition
CNR: TNVR070011602023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
45/2023
Filing Date
21-04-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.S.Kamalam
Adv. N.Lakshmikandan
Respondent(s)
Karuppasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 02-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.03 of 2025 in RLTOP No.01/2023 | Date: 13.03.2026 | Court: District Rent Control Court, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that K. Jeyaa (wife of the respondent Karuppaswamy) be added as the 2nd respondent/defendant in the original rent dispute case (RLTOP 01/2023) under Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found that adding her as a party is necessary since she is allegedly the actual tenant using the property, and the original case lacks proper parties for effective adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: I.A.03 of 2025 in RLTOP No.01/2023 | Date: 13.03.2026 | Court: District Rent Control Court, Chengalpattu (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that K. Jeyaa (wife of the respondent Karuppaswamy) be added as the 2nd respondent/defendant in the original rent dispute case (RLTOP 01/2023) under Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found that adding her as a party is necessary since she is allegedly the actual tenant using the property, and the original case lacks proper parties for effective adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts