Murugan vs Rakkappan — 63/2024

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR070006662024

Filing Number

85/2024

Filing Date

19-Aug-2024

Registration No

63/2024

Registration Date

20-Aug-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I Court, Sattur

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section 27(c)
Ia/1/2026 Classification : 151 Petition Section Murugan

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugan

    Adv. V. Vinayagamoorthy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakkappan

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    In Case 63/2024 before the District Civil Court, Sattur, petitioner Murugan filed his examination-in-chief affidavit on 21.01.2026 with supporting documentary evidence including lease deeds (2023, 2022), settlement deeds (2004), GST and MSME certificates, and tax receipts relating to agricultural properties. The court admitted Murugan's affidavit and marked the submitted documents as evidence, with one document deferred at the respondent's counsel's request pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  14. 13-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  16. 19-Jul-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  19. 08-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  20. 07-Jul-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  21. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  22. 11-Jun-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  23. 21-Apr-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  25. 24-Jan-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  26. 06-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  27. 21-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  28. 20-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate No - I

  29. 20-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 19-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 63/2024 before the District Civil Court, Sattur, petitioner Murugan filed his examination-in-chief affidavit on 21.01.2026 with supporting documentary evidence including lease deeds (2023, 2022), settlement deeds (2004), GST and MSME certificates, and tax receipts relating to agricultural properties. The court admitted Murugan's affidavit and marked the submitted documents as evidence, with one document deferred at the respondent's counsel's request pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case