Vembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act vs Palanisamy Advocate - L. Murali — 446/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),352. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060071862022

Filing Number

7175/2022

Filing Date

22-Nov-2022

Registration No

446/2022

Registration Date

28-Nov-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Conviction

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Vembakottai P.S.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),352
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Palanisamy
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section PalanisamyVembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act
Mp/3/2024 Classification : Others Section PalanisamyVembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act
Mp/4/2024 Classification : Others Section PalanisamyVembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act
Mp/5/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Palanisamy
Mp/6/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section PalanisamyVembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vembakottai Police Station, U/s.294(b), 352 IPC and 4 of TNPHW Act

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Palanisamy Advocate - L. Murali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 446/2022 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Sattur Date: 07.05.2026 Decision: The court convicted accused Palanisamy under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 352 (criminal intimidation), and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act. The court found that on 21.04.2022, the accused verbally abused the victim (a woman) with obscene language, grabbed her hair, and assaulted her, causing her distress and humiliation. Sentence: Fine of ₹10,000 under Section 294(b), ₹500 under Section 352, and imprisonment until court closure plus ₹10,000 fine under Section 4 TNPHW Act. The accused's evidence statements were rejected based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborating the victim's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  4. 06-May-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  5. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  7. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  9. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  14. 16-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  15. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  16. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  17. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  18. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  19. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  20. 17-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  21. 17-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  22. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  23. 10-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  24. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  25. 02-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  26. 12-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  27. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  28. 08-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  29. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  30. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  31. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  32. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  33. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  34. 31-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  35. 28-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  36. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  37. 10-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  38. 28-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  39. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  40. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  41. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  42. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  43. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  44. 28-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  45. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  46. 28-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  47. 27-Jan-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  48. 03-Jan-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  49. 28-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 22-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 446/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Calendar Case No. 446/2022 Court: Judicial Magistrate No. II, Sattur Date: 07.05.2026 Decision: The court convicted accused Palanisamy under IPC Sections 294(b) (obscene language) and 352 (criminal intimidation), and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act. The court found that on 21.04.2022, the accused verbally abused the victim (a woman) with obscene language, grabbed her hair, and assaulted her, causing her distress and humiliation. Sentence: Fine of ₹10,000 under Section 294(b), ₹500 under Section 352, and imprisonment until court closure plus ₹10,000 fine under Section 4 TNPHW Act. The accused's evidence statements were rejected based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborating the victim's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case