Ramasamy vs Muthumanickam Advocate - S. Jeyapandi — 1241/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR060031712025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
13-08-2025
Filing Number
3160/2025
Filing Date
14-08-2025
Registration No
1241/2025
Registration Date
18-09-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy
Adv. ARUMUGARAJA G
Respondent(s)
Muthumanickam Advocate - S. Jeyapandi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-01-2026 | Questioning |
| 22-01-2026 | Questioning |
| 26-12-2025 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Case No. STC 1241/2025 - Sattur Magistrate Court (10.02.2026) This is a cheque bounce case under BNSS Section 351(1)(b) wherein the complainant (Ramasamy) alleged that the accused (Muthumanikam) received ₹3,00,000 on 20.03.2025 for family expenses with a promise to repay within 3 months, then issued a cheque dated 19.06.2025 which was dishonored on 20.06.2025 as "Account Closed." The accused denied receiving any money, claiming the cheque was given as a blank instrument for legitimate sub-contract work purposes and that he had not visited Sattur in four years. The case records the examination-in-chief of the accused with his statement recorded on 10.02.2026; no final order granting/dismissing the petition is provided in this document excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case No. STC 1241/2025 - Sattur Magistrate Court (10.02.2026) This is a cheque bounce case under BNSS Section 351(1)(b) wherein the complainant (Ramasamy) alleged that the accused (Muthumanikam) received ₹3,00,000 on 20.03.2025 for family expenses with a promise to repay within 3 months, then issued a cheque dated 19.06.2025 which was dishonored on 20.06.2025 as "Account Closed." The accused denied receiving any money, claiming the cheque was given as a blank instrument for legitimate sub-contract work purposes and that he had not visited Sattur in four years. The case records the examination-in-chief of the accused with his statement recorded on 10.02.2026; no final order granting/dismissing the petition is provided in this document excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts