Sattur Taluk Police Stition, U/s.279,304(A) IPC vs Sundarrajan Advocate - S.Sasikumar — 161/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVR060030062022
Filing Number
3002/2022
Filing Date
06-Jul-2022
Registration No
161/2022
Registration Date
06-Jul-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
173
Police Station
Sattur Taluk P.S.,
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sattur Taluk Police Stition, U/s.279,304(A) IPC
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sundarrajan Advocate - S.Sasikumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
CASE SUMMARY In this motor vehicle accident case, the court acquitted accused Sundarrajan of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence). Though the court found a fatal collision occurred on August 16, 2021, where a motorcycle rear-ended a two-wheeler causing the victim's death, the government failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving recklessly or negligently. Critically, the two eyewitnesses did not testify that the accused caused the collision—they only described the accident itself. The court concluded that insufficient evidence linked the accused's alleged rash/negligent driving to the victim's death, warranting his acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
27-Apr-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
23-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
10-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
06-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
30-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Sep-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
31-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
27-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
26-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
31-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
02-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
12-Aug-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
06-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 161/2022
CASE SUMMARY In this motor vehicle accident case, the court acquitted accused Sundarrajan of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence). Though the court found a fatal collision occurred on August 16, 2021, where a motorcycle rear-ended a two-wheeler causing the victim's death, the government failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving recklessly or negligently. Critically, the two eyewitnesses did not testify that the accused caused the collision—they only described the accident itself. The court concluded that insufficient evidence linked the accused's alleged rash/negligent driving to the victim's death, warranting his acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts