Irukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC vs Lakshmanapirabu and 3 others Advocate - D. Palanikumar — 157/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii),326. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060029872022

Filing Number

2983/2022

Filing Date

05-Jul-2022

Registration No

157/2022

Registration Date

05-Jul-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

Irukkankudi P.S.,

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),506(ii),326
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Lakshmanapirabu and 3 others
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Lakshmanapirabu and 3 othersIrukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC
Mp/3/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Lakshmanapirabu and 3 others
Mp/4/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Lakshmanapirabu and 3 others
Mp/5/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 320 Cr.pc Section Irukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Irukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC
Mp/8/2026 Classification : 294 Cr.pc Section Irukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Irukkangudi Police Station, U/s.294(b),506(ii),326 IPC

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmanapirabu and 3 others Advocate - D. Palanikumar

  2. 2.Mahalakshmi

    Adv. D. Palanikumar

  3. 3.Velthai

    Adv. D. Palanikumar

  4. 4.Kamala

    Adv. D. Palanikumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 157/2022, Sattur Judicial Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (Lakshmanapirabu, Mahalakshmi, Velthai, and Kamaa) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(ii). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony was inconsistent with his original complaint and contained significant contradictions. Medical evidence corroborated injury but the court found insufficient credible testimony linking the accused to the alleged September 18, 2021 assault. The prosecution relied primarily on the complainant-witness's statement, which lacked coherence regarding whether he actually filed the complaint and his current relationship with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  12. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  13. 26-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  14. 26-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  15. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  16. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  17. 02-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  18. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  19. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  20. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  21. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  22. 03-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  23. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  24. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  25. 11-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  26. 24-Jul-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  27. 29-May-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  28. 27-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  29. 27-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  30. 26-Dec-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  31. 31-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  32. 30-Aug-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  33. 08-Aug-2022

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  34. 05-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 05-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 157/2022, Sattur Judicial Magistrate Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (Lakshmanapirabu, Mahalakshmi, Velthai, and Kamaa) of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 326, and 506(ii). The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their release under Section 248(1) CrPC. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony was inconsistent with his original complaint and contained significant contradictions. Medical evidence corroborated injury but the court found insufficient credible testimony linking the accused to the alleged September 18, 2021 assault. The prosecution relied primarily on the complainant-witness's statement, which lacked coherence regarding whether he actually filed the complaint and his current relationship with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case