Paramasivam M U/s.138 of NI Act vs Harikrishna R Advocate - C.Muthukannu — 804/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR060022942024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
13-11-2024
Filing Number
2276/2024
Filing Date
28-11-2024
Registration No
804/2024
Registration Date
28-11-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Paramasivam M U/s.138 of NI Act
Adv. Sankarram M
Respondent(s)
Harikrishna R Advocate - C.Muthukannu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: S.T.C. No. 804 of 2024, Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Sattur Outcome: Deposition of PW1 (witness) recorded on January 6, 2026. The witness testified regarding a loan dispute, confirming he lent ₹1,50,000 to the accused on July 6, 2024, with a postdated cheque as security. The witness denied allegations of harassment and confirmed the accused has since partially repaid amounts through digital transfers. The court recorded the witness's testimony in open court, which was interpreted and admitted as correct by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: S.T.C. No. 804 of 2024, Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Sattur Outcome: Deposition of PW1 (witness) recorded on January 6, 2026. The witness testified regarding a loan dispute, confirming he lent ₹1,50,000 to the accused on July 6, 2024, with a postdated cheque as security. The witness denied allegations of harassment and confirmed the accused has since partially repaid amounts through digital transfers. The court recorded the witness's testimony in open court, which was interpreted and admitted as correct by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts