Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379, 411 IPC vs Vijayakumar alias Viji Advocate - S. Jeyapandi — 82/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060020722023

Filing Number

2072/2023

Filing Date

08-Mar-2023

Registration No

82/2023

Registration Date

08-Mar-2023

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

527

Police Station

Sattur Town P.S.,

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,411
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Vijayakumar alias Viji
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Vijayakumar alias Viji
Mp/3/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Vijayakumar alias Viji
Mp/4/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Vijayakumar alias Viji
Mp/5/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Vijayakumar alias Viji
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379, 411 IPC
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379, 411 IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379, 411 IPC

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayakumar alias Viji Advocate - S. Jeyapandi

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  3. 12-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary of Case 82/2023 On 09.03.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Sattur recorded witness depositions in this theft and receiving stolen property case (IPC §379, 411). Multiple witnesses testified regarding a two-wheeler theft case from 2021, with several witnesses declaring they had no knowledge of the case details and disavowing signatures on confessional statements allegedly made by the accused. The accused was absent throughout proceedings, with petitions under CrPC §317 filed and allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  11. 27-Oct-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  13. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  14. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  15. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  16. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  17. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  18. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  19. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  20. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  21. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  22. 09-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  23. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  24. 27-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  25. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  26. 09-May-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  27. 27-Apr-2023

    Framing of Charges

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  28. 21-Mar-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  29. 08-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 08-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 82/2023 On 09.03.2026, the Judicial Magistrate Court No. 2, Sattur recorded witness depositions in this theft and receiving stolen property case (IPC §379, 411). Multiple witnesses testified regarding a two-wheeler theft case from 2021, with several witnesses declaring they had no knowledge of the case details and disavowing signatures on confessional statements allegedly made by the accused. The accused was absent throughout proceedings, with petitions under CrPC §317 filed and allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case