Perumalsamy vs Mareeswari — 1322/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR060015942024
e-Filing Number
15-07-2024
Filing Number
1580/2024
Filing Date
16-Jul-2024
Registration No
1322/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Perumalsamy
Adv. KATHIRESAN P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mareeswari
Case History
-
30-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Mediation
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
06-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
This is a Judicial Magistrate II court order from Sattur, dated January 6, 2026, in a criminal case (STC No. 1322/2025) under BNSS Section 351(1)(a). The document records the examination-in-chief of the accused (defendant) regarding a disputed house purchase agreement worth ₹16.5 lakhs where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay the remaining balance of ₹4.01 lakhs. The case involves allegations of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The examination is still ongoing with the defendant's testimony being recorded; the case appears to be adjourned for further examination of witnesses, as the defendant indicated he has witnesses to examine on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jan-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
09-Dec-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
28-Nov-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1322/2025
This is a Judicial Magistrate II court order from Sattur, dated January 6, 2026, in a criminal case (STC No. 1322/2025) under BNSS Section 351(1)(a). The document records the examination-in-chief of the accused (defendant) regarding a disputed house purchase agreement worth ₹16.5 lakhs where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay the remaining balance of ₹4.01 lakhs. The case involves allegations of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The examination is still ongoing with the defendant's testimony being recorded; the case appears to be adjourned for further examination of witnesses, as the defendant indicated he has witnesses to examine on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts