Perumalsamy vs Mareeswari — 1322/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR060015942024
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
e-Filing Number
15-07-2024
Filing Number
1580/2024
Filing Date
16-07-2024
Registration No
1322/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Perumalsamy
Adv. KATHIRESAN P
Respondent(s)
Mareeswari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Mediation
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Questioning |
| 09-12-2025 | Questioning |
| 28-11-2025 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
This is a Judicial Magistrate II court order from Sattur, dated January 6, 2026, in a criminal case (STC No. 1322/2025) under BNSS Section 351(1)(a). The document records the examination-in-chief of the accused (defendant) regarding a disputed house purchase agreement worth ₹16.5 lakhs where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay the remaining balance of ₹4.01 lakhs. The case involves allegations of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The examination is still ongoing with the defendant's testimony being recorded; the case appears to be adjourned for further examination of witnesses, as the defendant indicated he has witnesses to examine on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Judicial Magistrate II court order from Sattur, dated January 6, 2026, in a criminal case (STC No. 1322/2025) under BNSS Section 351(1)(a). The document records the examination-in-chief of the accused (defendant) regarding a disputed house purchase agreement worth ₹16.5 lakhs where the plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay the remaining balance of ₹4.01 lakhs. The case involves allegations of cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The examination is still ongoing with the defendant's testimony being recorded; the case appears to be adjourned for further examination of witnesses, as the defendant indicated he has witnesses to examine on his behalf. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts