Sub Inspector of Police, Alangulam PS, U/s.341, 294(b), 324, 506( vs Muthukumar Advocate - D. Vellayaraja — 44/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,294(b),324,506(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 14th August 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVR060007302021
Filing Number
706/2021
Filing Date
27-Jul-2021
Registration No
44/2021
Registration Date
27-Jul-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate No. II
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
370
Police Station
Alangulam P.S.,
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sub Inspector of Police, Alangulam PS (Police Station), U/s.341, 294(b), 324, 506(
-
2.IPC
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthukumar Advocate - D. Vellayaraja
Case History
-
14-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 44/2021, JM 2 Court, Sattur This document records the deposition of PW2 (witness) in a criminal case dated 15.06.2026 involving charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, and 506. The witness testified that on 21.10.2020, accused Muthukumar engaged in an altercation with her husband over a shared boundary wall dispute, during which he verbally abused, assaulted, bit the husband's finger causing bleeding, knocked him down, and threatened him with death. The defense cross-examination challenged the witness's credibility and version of events. The deposition was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
03-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
11-May-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
11-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
15-Apr-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
11-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
17-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
05-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
15-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
22-May-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
31-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
13-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
23-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
05-Jul-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
17-May-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
15-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
18-Feb-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
05-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
01-Dec-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
23-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
03-Aug-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
22-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
11-May-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
30-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
16-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
30-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
02-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
22-Sep-2021
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate No. II
-
26-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jul-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2021
Case Summary: CC No. 44/2021, JM 2 Court, Sattur This document records the deposition of PW2 (witness) in a criminal case dated 15.06.2026 involving charges under IPC sections 341, 294(b), 324, and 506. The witness testified that on 21.10.2020, accused Muthukumar engaged in an altercation with her husband over a shared boundary wall dispute, during which he verbally abused, assaulted, bit the husband's finger causing bleeding, knocked him down, and threatened him with death. The defense cross-examination challenged the witness's credibility and version of events. The deposition was recorded in open court and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts