Mariselvam vs Sattur Taluk Police Station Advocate - APP — 287/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR060006342026

Filing Number

633/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

287/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mariselvam

    Adv. D.Vellaiyaraja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sattur Taluk Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The J.M. No.II Court, Sattur granted bail to the accused Marichselvan in a theft case involving stolen goats valued at ₹35,000, finding no necessity to keep him in judicial custody since the investigation should be completed within the prescribed timeframe. The court imposed bail conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, restrictions on tampering with witnesses or absconding, and a prohibition from committing similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 287/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The J.M. No.II Court, Sattur granted bail to the accused Marichselvan in a theft case involving stolen goats valued at ₹35,000, finding no necessity to keep him in judicial custody since the investigation should be completed within the prescribed timeframe. The court imposed bail conditions including a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, restrictions on tampering with witnesses or absconding, and a prohibition from committing similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case