Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.279, 304(A) IPC vs Zeyffullah Advocate - V.A.Viswanath — 85/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060005282020

Part Heard

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

515/2020

Filing Date

23-09-2020

Registration No

85/2020

Registration Date

23-09-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Zeyffullah
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section ZeyffullahSattur Town Police Station, U/s.279, 304(A) IPC

Petitioner(s)

Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.279, 304(A) IPC

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Zeyffullah Advocate - V.A.Viswanath

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

13-03-2026

Part Heard

06-03-2026

Part Heard

03-03-2026

Part Heard

27-02-2026

Part Heard

26-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

04-02-2026
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

Summary This is a deposition of PW5 (witness) in Case No. 85 of 2020 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sattur, recorded on February 4, 2026. The witness, a retired government inspector, testified regarding an accident case registered under IPC sections 279 and 304(A) that occurred on May 29-30, 2019. During cross-examination, the witness admitted significant procedural lapses including failing to file the initial FIR before receiving the complaint, lack of proper investigation procedures, and inadequate documentation of the crime scene. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a deposition of PW5 (witness) in Case No. 85 of 2020 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sattur, recorded on February 4, 2026. The witness, a retired government inspector, testified regarding an accident case registered under IPC sections 279 and 304(A) that occurred on May 29-30, 2019. During cross-examination, the witness admitted significant procedural lapses including failing to file the initial FIR before receiving the complaint, lack of proper investigation procedures, and inadequate documentation of the crime scene. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case