Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.279, 304(A) IPC vs Zeyffullah Advocate - V.A.Viswanath — 85/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Part Heard Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060005282020

Filing Number

515/2020

Filing Date

23-Sep-2020

Registration No

85/2020

Registration Date

23-Sep-2020

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.279, 304(A) IPC

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Zeyffullah Advocate - V.A.Viswanath

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary This is a deposition of PW5 (witness) in Case No. 85 of 2020 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sattur, recorded on February 4, 2026. The witness, a retired government inspector, testified regarding an accident case registered under IPC sections 279 and 304(A) that occurred on May 29-30, 2019. During cross-examination, the witness admitted significant procedural lapses including failing to file the initial FIR before receiving the complaint, lack of proper investigation procedures, and inadequate documentation of the crime scene. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  14. 17-Dec-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  18. 14-Oct-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  19. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  20. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  22. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  23. 19-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  24. 12-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  25. 22-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  26. 09-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  27. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  28. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  29. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  30. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  31. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  32. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  33. 01-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  34. 30-May-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  35. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  36. 29-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  37. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  38. 30-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  39. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  40. 07-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  41. 20-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  42. 01-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  43. 06-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  44. 09-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  45. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  46. 20-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  47. 08-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  48. 28-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  49. 16-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  50. 05-May-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  51. 31-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  52. 17-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  53. 13-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  54. 02-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  55. 21-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  56. 09-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  57. 05-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  58. 17-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  59. 22-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  60. 11-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  61. 01-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  62. 03-Nov-2020

    For further Proceedings

    Judicial Magistrate No. II

  63. 22-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 23-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a deposition of PW5 (witness) in Case No. 85 of 2020 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Sattur, recorded on February 4, 2026. The witness, a retired government inspector, testified regarding an accident case registered under IPC sections 279 and 304(A) that occurred on May 29-30, 2019. During cross-examination, the witness admitted significant procedural lapses including failing to file the initial FIR before receiving the complaint, lack of proper investigation procedures, and inadequate documentation of the crime scene. The deposition was recorded and admitted as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case