Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379 IPC (Sand Theft) vs Pavunraj and 1 other Advocate - Ganeshamoorthi G — 181/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060001942018

Evidence

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

101257/2018

Filing Date

05-06-2018

Registration No

181/2025

Registration Date

05-06-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Pavunraj and 1 other
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379 IPC (Sand Theft)
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379 IPC (Sand Theft)

Petitioner(s)

Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.379 IPC (Sand Theft)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Pavunraj and 1 other Advocate - Ganeshamoorthi G

Balamurugan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

17-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Evidence

19-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 181 of 2025 before Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Sattur (dated 09.03.2026), the deposition of witness Deivarajam (PW3) was recorded under Chapter XXIII CrPC. A petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed due to the accused's absence. The witness testified regarding his observations at the case location near Shakthi Mariyamman temple and confirmed police investigation procedures, though his credibility was challenged during cross-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 181 of 2025 before Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Sattur (dated 09.03.2026), the deposition of witness Deivarajam (PW3) was recorded under Chapter XXIII CrPC. A petition under Section 317 CrPC was filed and allowed due to the accused's absence. The witness testified regarding his observations at the case location near Shakthi Mariyamman temple and confirmed police investigation procedures, though his credibility was challenged during cross-examination by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case